Dr. Jishnu Mohan

Hello, My Name Is

Dr. JishnuMohan.

Devices made at the bedside.

AIR 1 · AIIMS PhD 2025 AIR 37 · NEET PG 2022 AIR 91 · INI CET Nov 2022 Best Research Paper · AOMSI 2025

Surgeon scientist and medical technology innovator. I design instruments, implants, and devices that solve problems I meet in the operating theatre, built for the realities of resource limited care.

Collaborate
Scroll

At work,
in theatre.

Every device in this portfolio began as a problem encountered during a surgery, observed, measured, and re engineered between cases.

Dr. Jishnu Mohan in the operating theatre

Selected Work

Five devices.

Full Index →
01

Postoperative Drain Fixation

Drain Tube Retention Button

A 12 mm garment button transferring drain load from sutured skin onto hospital gown fabric.

Case Study →
02

Patient Specific Implants

Patient Specific PEEK Implants

A custom built 380°C PEEK 3D printer producing CT derived maxillofacial implants at a fraction of commercial cost.

Case Study →
03

Home Tracheostomy Care

Portable Battery Powered Suction Device

A frugal, pressure controlled suction unit for home tracheostomy care in power unreliable settings.

Case Study →
04

Intraoperative Nerve Protection

Ryles Tube Nerve Sleeve

A near zero cost 360° nerve shield from a sterile nasogastric tube protecting the IAN during mandibular osteotomy.

Case Study →
05

Transoral Submandibular Access

Finger Mounted Intraoral Dissector

A wearable finger sheath combining loop scissor spreading and Metzenbaum dissection for transoral submandibular access without a transcervical incision.

Case Study →

Selected Work

Five devices.

← Home
01

Postoperative Drain Fixation

Drain Tube Retention Button

A 12 mm garment button transferring drain load from sutured skin onto hospital gown fabric, eliminating tension at the suture site in high risk post chemoradiation patients.

Case Study →
02

Patient Specific Implants

Patient Specific PEEK Implants

A custom built 380°C PEEK 3D printer producing CT derived maxillofacial implants at a fraction of commercial cost. First Prize, MDU National Technology Day 2024.

Case Study →
03

Home Tracheostomy Care

Portable Battery Powered Suction Device

A frugal, pressure controlled suction unit for home tracheostomy care in power unreliable settings.

Case Study →
04

Intraoperative Nerve Protection

Ryles Tube Nerve Sleeve

A near zero cost 360° nerve shield repurposed from a sterile Ryles nasogastric tube protecting the IAN during mandibular osteotomy. Technical Note under review, JOMS.

Case Study →
05

Transoral Submandibular Access

Finger Mounted Intraoral Dissector

A wearable finger sheath combining loop scissor spreading and Metzenbaum dissection enabling transoral submandibular gland access without a transcervical incision.

Case Study →
← Back to IndexProject 01 / 05

Postoperative Drain Fixation

Drain Tube
Retention
Button

A 12 mm garment button transferring drain load from sutured skin onto hospital gown fabric.

Conceived and designed at PGIMS Rohtak · CAD: SolidWorks · Physical prototype pending

CAD model

CAD Reference · Drain Tube Retention Button Concept Development · SolidWorks

The Problem

Closed suction drains after major neck dissections are prone to dislodgement under the unsupported weight of the external connector and collection bottle assembly, a risk particularly significant after major neck dissections in oncology patients. Working with an expert with SolidWorks experience, I designed an oval button (12 mm diameter, 2.5 mm thick, U shaped drain channel sized to 7 mm OD drain tubing) that clips onto the drain tube and buttons into the patient's hospital gown, transferring load from the suture site to the garment fabric. All dimensions were derived from direct first hand clinical measurements. The oval profile was specifically selected to prevent tube slippage from the retention channel, a failure mode of the paper clip and micropore workarounds currently used in clinical practice.

Biodesign Stage Progress

CodeStageStatusWhat Was Done
1.1Strategic Focus✓ CompleteFocused on postoperative drain management in head and neck oncology surgical patients
1.2Needs Exploration✓ CompleteObserved recurring drain dislodgement; identified paper clip workaround as inadequate
1.3Need Statement✓ CompletePost neck dissection patients need reliable drain fixation without skin trauma
2.1Disease State✓ CompleteCharacterised risk profile: post chemoradiation oncology patients; consequences documented
2.2Existing Solutions✓ CompleteBenchmarked against suture only fixation and paper clip methods; failure modes identified
3.1Ideation✓ CompleteConceived garment button integrated drain sleeve; oval profile selected to prevent slippage
3.2Concept Selection✓ CompleteButton channel design selected; dimensions derived from direct clinical measurements
4.1IP Basics► ActiveIP landscape review pending; provisional filing to be initiated
4.5Prototyping► Active3D CAD model completed in SolidWorks; physical prototype pending
5+Implementation○ PendingRegulatory, clinical validation, and commercialisation pathway to be developed
← Back to IndexProject 02 / 05

Patient Specific Implants

Patient Specific
PEEK Implants

A custom built 380°C PEEK 3D printer producing CT derived maxillofacial implants at a fraction of commercial cost.

First Prize — MDU National Technology Day Exhibition · Featured in The Tribune, May 2024

Custom PEEK 3D Printer

Custom PEEK 3D Printer · UIET, Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak

The Tribune May 2024

The Tribune · May 2024 — Jaw dropping innovation: Rohtak varsity implant aims to transform oral surgery

The Problem

Titanium, the current standard in oral implants, is rigid and can cause secondary bone and tissue damage. Commercial patient specific PEEK implants are priced beyond reach for most Indian institutions. Each patient requires a unique implant derived from their own imaging data.

The Solution

In collaboration with the Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, UIET, MDU Rohtak, a custom PEEK 3D printer was built from scratch with nozzle temperature above 380°C and a controlled heated chamber. PEEK absorbs impact like natural bone, is biocompatible, and withstands sterilisation up to 500°C. Each implant is derived from the patient's CT scan via Mimics software for segmentation and patient specific CAD modelling.

Biodesign Stage Progress

CodeStageStatusWhat Was Done
1.2Needs Exploration✓ CompleteIdentified titanium implant limitations: rigidity, secondary bone damage, prohibitive cost
1.3Need Statement✓ CompleteMaxillofacial patients need affordable, biocompatible, patient specific implants
2.2Existing Solutions✓ CompleteBenchmarked against titanium and commercial PEEK printers; cost identified as primary barrier
2.4Market Analysis✓ CompleteCommercial medical grade PEEK printing places implants out of reach for most Indian institutions
3.1Ideation✓ CompleteConceived in house PEEK 3D printer build; CT to Mimics to implant workflow designed
4.5Prototyping✓ CompleteCustom PEEK printer built; patient specific implants fabricated and used intraoperatively
4.6Concept Testing► ActiveCadaveric validation planned prior to formal clinical trials
5+Implementation○ PendingRegulatory submission, clinical trial design, and commercialisation pathway to be developed
← Back to IndexProject 03 / 05

Home Tracheostomy Care

Portable Battery Powered
Suction Device

A frugal, pressure controlled suction unit for home tracheostomy care in power unreliable settings.

Ongoing — Need Statement Validated · Development in progress

Portable suction device

Concept Reference — Portable Battery Powered Suction Assembly

The Problem

Patients discharged home on tracheostomy tubes in resource limited settings face a critical unmet need: AC powered suction devices fail during power outages, routine in rural and semi urban India, leaving tracheostomy blockage with no reliable management option at home. Battery powered alternatives (Laerdal being the recognised gold standard) are priced far beyond the reach of this patient population.

The Solution

Structured needs finding was conducted to formally characterise the patient population, failure point, clinical consequence, and existing solution gap. Development of a low cost, battery powered, pressure controlled portable suction device designed for home care use in resource limited settings is currently ongoing.

Biodesign Stage Progress

CodeStageStatusWhat Was Done
1.1Strategic Focus✓ CompleteFocused on home tracheostomy care failure in power unreliable settings
1.2Needs Exploration✓ CompleteObserved patients returning with trach blocks; AC power dependency identified as root cause
1.3Need Statement✓ CompleteFormally validated: tracheostomy patients need reliable, affordable, battery powered portable suction
2.2Existing Solutions✓ CompleteBenchmarked against Laerdal Suction Unit; cost identified as prohibitive barrier
2.4Market Analysis► ActiveEstimating patient population size, complication frequency, and willingness to pay
2.5Needs Selection► ActiveNeeds prioritisation and solution criteria definition in progress
3+Invent○ PendingIdeation, concept generation, and prototyping to follow needs finalisation
5+Implementation○ PendingIP, regulatory, and commercialisation strategy to be developed
← Back to IndexProject 04 / 05

Intraoperative Nerve Protection

Ryles Tube
Nerve Sleeve

A near zero cost 360° nerve shield repurposed from a sterile nasogastric tube protecting the IAN during mandibular osteotomy.

Technical Note under review — JOMS · 6 month follow up: intact IAN function

Nerve sleeve surgical illustrations

Operative Illustration Panels — Ryles Tube Nerve Sleeve Technique for IAN Protection

The Problem

Inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) injury during mandibular osteotomy causes transient neurosensory deficits in up to 37% of cases. Piezoelectric systems reduce this risk but are unaffordable in resource limited settings. Conventional vessel loops provide protection on one surface only.

The Solution

A sterile Ryles nasogastric tube, universally stocked at near zero cost, slit longitudinally and placed as a 360° circumferential nerve shield sleeve. Formalised into a reproducible protocol with a French size selection table matched to published IAN canal diameters. Applied intraoperatively: fully intact IAN sensory function at 6 month review.

Biodesign Stage Progress

CodeStageStatusWhat Was Done
1.2Needs Exploration✓ CompleteIAN injury risk during osteotomy identified as high stakes unmet need in resource limited centres
1.3Need Statement✓ CompleteSurgeons need a low cost, reliable, 360° nerve protection method during IAN transposition
2.2Existing Solutions✓ CompleteBenchmarked against vessel loops and piezoelectric systems; key gaps identified
3.1Ideation✓ CompleteConceived Ryles tube as circumferential nerve sleeve, repurposing stocked theatre consumable
3.2Concept Selection✓ CompleteFrench size selection protocol developed; failure modes identified and mitigated
4.5Prototyping✓ CompleteTechnique applied intraoperatively: 6 month follow up confirms intact IAN function
4.6Concept Testing✓ CompleteClinical outcome validated; reproducible protocol with sizing table documented
5.1IP Strategy► ActivePatent landscape review pending; manuscript under review at JOMS
5+Implementation○ PendingMulticentre prospective study, regulatory classification, and adoption strategy to be developed
← Back to IndexProject 05 / 05

Transoral Submandibular Access

Finger Mounted
Intraoral
Dissector

A wearable finger sheath combining loop scissor spreading and Metzenbaum dissection for transoral submandibular access without a transcervical incision.

Concept and mechanism design ongoing · IP landscape search to be initiated

The Problem

Submandibular gland and duct surgery conventionally requires an extraoral transcervical incision, resulting in a visible neck scar with risk to the marginal mandibular branch of the facial nerve. Transoral access via the floor of mouth is limited by confined working space where standard scissors cannot be effectively oriented.

The Solution

A finger mounted dissector combining loop scissor spreading action with Metzenbaum scissor tissue separation, worn as a finger sheath, integrating tactile duct palpation with active blunt dissection in a single motion within a space too confined for two handed instrumentation. Eliminates the transcervical incision and its associated morbidity entirely.

Biodesign Stage Progress

CodeStageStatusWhat Was Done
1.2Needs Exploration✓ CompleteAccess limitation identified as driver of extraoral approach
1.3Need Statement✓ CompleteSurgeons need compact intraoral instrument for transoral submandibular gland access
2.2Existing Solutions✓ CompleteBenchmarked against sialendoscopy and handheld scissors; confined space access gap identified
3.1Ideation✓ CompleteConceived finger mounted dissector combining loop scissor and Metzenbaum mechanics
3.2Concept Selection► ActiveMechanism design and ergonomic refinement ongoing; instrument profile being defined
4.1IP Basics► ActiveIP landscape search to be conducted; provisional filing to be initiated
4.5Prototyping○ PendingPhysical prototype, bench testing, and cadaveric feasibility study to follow
5+Implementation○ PendingRegulatory pathway, clinical validation, and commercialisation strategy to be developed

About

Surgeon.
Scientist.
Innovator.

Oral and maxillofacial surgeon with a record of translating clinical challenges into original device innovations, computational implant design, and high quality evidence synthesis. Combines surgical expertise with computational tools including FEA, implicit modelling, and additive manufacturing.

0+
Surgical procedures across oncology, oral surgery, trauma and orthognathic
0
Original device innovations
0
Publications: published and under review
0
National competitive exam ranks in top 100

National Rankings

#1
All India Rank 1
AIIMS New Delhi PhD Entrance Examination 2025 · Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
#37
All India Rank 37
NEET PG 2022
#91
All India Rank 91
INI CET November 2022
Clinical
Head and Neck Oncology · Pathology · Trauma
TMJ Disorders · Pain Management · Total Joint Replacement
Patient Specific Implant Planning and Fabrication
Dentoalveolar Surgery · Dental and Zygomatic Implants
Computational and Engineering
Implicit Modelling: PicoGK · nTop · Biomimetic Lattice Design
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Workflows
FEA Stress Analysis of Craniofacial Structures
SolidWorks · Medical Image Segmentation (Mimics)
Research and Academic
Systematic Review and Meta Analysis Methodology
Statistical Analysis: SPSS · Database Design: REDCap
Manuscript Writing and Scientific Editing
BLS and ACLS Certified · GCP Certified

Career

Jan 2025 to Jun 2026

Consultant Head and Neck Surgical Oncologist

Homi Bhabha Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Muzaffarpur
Tata Memorial Centre Affiliate · Head and Neck Disease Management Group

2022 to 2025

Resident Surgeon — MDS, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

PGIMS Rohtak, Pt. B.D. Sharma University of Health Sciences
Rotatory Posting, Dept. of Surgical Oncology · 500+ procedures
Best Research Paper, AOMSI Haryana State Chapter 2025

2022 to 2025

MDS — Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

PGIMS, Pt. B.D. Sharma University of Health Sciences, Rohtak

2014 to 2019

Bachelor of Dental Surgery (BDS)

Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences

Awards and Recognition

All India Rank 1 — AIIMS New Delhi PhD Entrance Examination 2025 (Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery)
Best Research Paper Award — AOMSI Haryana State Chapter Annual Conference, 2025
First Prize — MDU National Technology Day Exhibition (PEEK Implants, 2024)
All India Rank 91 — INI CET November 2022
All India Rank 37 — NEET PG 2022
Featured — The Tribune, May 2024

Bibliography

Published and
in review.

  • 01Atypical coronoid process displacement in ZMC trauma: technical considerations and management algorithm — Technical Note, Principal Investigator. Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research.
  • 02Solitary fibrous tumor of temporal and infratemporal region: a case report and review — Case Report, 4th Author. Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery.
  • 03Solitary fibrous tumor of the head and neck: a systematic review of diagnostic approaches, surgical management, and outcomes — Systematic Review, 3rd Author. Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery.
  • 04Primary extracranial meningioma of the temporal region with oral extension — Case Report, 4th Author. Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery.
  • 05Surgical management of double fracture of subcondyle and parasymphysis fracture of mandible — Case Report, 4th Author. International Journal of Enhanced Research in Medicine and Dental Care.
  • 06Navigating diagnostic uncertainty in paediatric bilateral cervical lymphadenopathy: a systematic evidence review — Systematic Review, 2nd Author. Under Review.
  • 07Head and neck arteriovenous malformations: a systematic review of diagnosis, therapeutic approaches and prognosis — Systematic Review, Principal Investigator. Under Review.
  • 08Ryles Tube Nerve Sleeve for Inferior Alveolar Nerve Protection during Mandibular Osteotomy — Technical Note, Principal Investigator. Under Review, Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (JOMS).

For Innovators

Building something
at this intersection?

I collaborate with engineers, designers, clinicians, and founders working on surgical instrumentation, implants, and frugal medical technology. If you are building at the intersection of surgery and engineering, I would like to hear about it.

drjishnumaxcfac@gmail.com

Recent Experience

Consultant Head and Neck Surgical Oncologist

Homi Bhabha Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Muzaffarpur
Tata Memorial Centre Affiliate · Jan 2025 to Jun 2026

Resident Surgeon — MDS, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

PGIMS Rohtak, Pt. B.D. Sharma University of Health Sciences · 2022 to 2025