Hello, My Name Is
Devices made at the bedside.
Surgeon scientist and medical technology innovator. I design instruments, implants, and devices that solve problems I meet in the operating theatre, built for the realities of resource limited care.
Every device in this portfolio began as a problem encountered during a surgery, observed, measured, and re engineered between cases.
Selected Work
Postoperative Drain Fixation
A 12 mm garment button transferring drain load from sutured skin onto hospital gown fabric.
Patient Specific Implants
A custom built 380°C PEEK 3D printer producing CT derived maxillofacial implants at a fraction of commercial cost.
Home Tracheostomy Care
A frugal, pressure controlled suction unit for home tracheostomy care in power unreliable settings.
Intraoperative Nerve Protection
A near zero cost 360° nerve shield from a sterile nasogastric tube protecting the IAN during mandibular osteotomy.
Transoral Submandibular Access
A wearable finger sheath combining loop scissor spreading and Metzenbaum dissection for transoral submandibular access without a transcervical incision.
Selected Work
Postoperative Drain Fixation
A 12 mm garment button transferring drain load from sutured skin onto hospital gown fabric, eliminating tension at the suture site in high risk post chemoradiation patients.
Patient Specific Implants
A custom built 380°C PEEK 3D printer producing CT derived maxillofacial implants at a fraction of commercial cost. First Prize, MDU National Technology Day 2024.
Home Tracheostomy Care
A frugal, pressure controlled suction unit for home tracheostomy care in power unreliable settings.
Intraoperative Nerve Protection
A near zero cost 360° nerve shield repurposed from a sterile Ryles nasogastric tube protecting the IAN during mandibular osteotomy. Technical Note under review, JOMS.
Transoral Submandibular Access
A wearable finger sheath combining loop scissor spreading and Metzenbaum dissection enabling transoral submandibular gland access without a transcervical incision.
Postoperative Drain Fixation
A 12 mm garment button transferring drain load from sutured skin onto hospital gown fabric.
◎ Conceived and designed at PGIMS Rohtak · CAD: SolidWorks · Physical prototype pending
CAD Reference · Drain Tube Retention Button Concept Development · SolidWorks
The Problem
Closed suction drains after major neck dissections are prone to dislodgement under the unsupported weight of the external connector and collection bottle assembly, a risk particularly significant after major neck dissections in oncology patients. Working with an expert with SolidWorks experience, I designed an oval button (12 mm diameter, 2.5 mm thick, U shaped drain channel sized to 7 mm OD drain tubing) that clips onto the drain tube and buttons into the patient's hospital gown, transferring load from the suture site to the garment fabric. All dimensions were derived from direct first hand clinical measurements. The oval profile was specifically selected to prevent tube slippage from the retention channel, a failure mode of the paper clip and micropore workarounds currently used in clinical practice.
Biodesign Stage Progress
| Code | Stage | Status | What Was Done |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.1 | Strategic Focus | ✓ Complete | Focused on postoperative drain management in head and neck oncology surgical patients |
| 1.2 | Needs Exploration | ✓ Complete | Observed recurring drain dislodgement; identified paper clip workaround as inadequate |
| 1.3 | Need Statement | ✓ Complete | Post neck dissection patients need reliable drain fixation without skin trauma |
| 2.1 | Disease State | ✓ Complete | Characterised risk profile: post chemoradiation oncology patients; consequences documented |
| 2.2 | Existing Solutions | ✓ Complete | Benchmarked against suture only fixation and paper clip methods; failure modes identified |
| 3.1 | Ideation | ✓ Complete | Conceived garment button integrated drain sleeve; oval profile selected to prevent slippage |
| 3.2 | Concept Selection | ✓ Complete | Button channel design selected; dimensions derived from direct clinical measurements |
| 4.1 | IP Basics | ► Active | IP landscape review pending; provisional filing to be initiated |
| 4.5 | Prototyping | ► Active | 3D CAD model completed in SolidWorks; physical prototype pending |
| 5+ | Implementation | ○ Pending | Regulatory, clinical validation, and commercialisation pathway to be developed |
Patient Specific Implants
A custom built 380°C PEEK 3D printer producing CT derived maxillofacial implants at a fraction of commercial cost.
★ First Prize — MDU National Technology Day Exhibition · Featured in The Tribune, May 2024
Custom PEEK 3D Printer · UIET, Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak
The Tribune · May 2024 — Jaw dropping innovation: Rohtak varsity implant aims to transform oral surgery
The Problem
Titanium, the current standard in oral implants, is rigid and can cause secondary bone and tissue damage. Commercial patient specific PEEK implants are priced beyond reach for most Indian institutions. Each patient requires a unique implant derived from their own imaging data.
The Solution
In collaboration with the Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, UIET, MDU Rohtak, a custom PEEK 3D printer was built from scratch with nozzle temperature above 380°C and a controlled heated chamber. PEEK absorbs impact like natural bone, is biocompatible, and withstands sterilisation up to 500°C. Each implant is derived from the patient's CT scan via Mimics software for segmentation and patient specific CAD modelling.
Biodesign Stage Progress
| Code | Stage | Status | What Was Done |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.2 | Needs Exploration | ✓ Complete | Identified titanium implant limitations: rigidity, secondary bone damage, prohibitive cost |
| 1.3 | Need Statement | ✓ Complete | Maxillofacial patients need affordable, biocompatible, patient specific implants |
| 2.2 | Existing Solutions | ✓ Complete | Benchmarked against titanium and commercial PEEK printers; cost identified as primary barrier |
| 2.4 | Market Analysis | ✓ Complete | Commercial medical grade PEEK printing places implants out of reach for most Indian institutions |
| 3.1 | Ideation | ✓ Complete | Conceived in house PEEK 3D printer build; CT to Mimics to implant workflow designed |
| 4.5 | Prototyping | ✓ Complete | Custom PEEK printer built; patient specific implants fabricated and used intraoperatively |
| 4.6 | Concept Testing | ► Active | Cadaveric validation planned prior to formal clinical trials |
| 5+ | Implementation | ○ Pending | Regulatory submission, clinical trial design, and commercialisation pathway to be developed |
Home Tracheostomy Care
A frugal, pressure controlled suction unit for home tracheostomy care in power unreliable settings.
◎ Ongoing — Need Statement Validated · Development in progress
Concept Reference — Portable Battery Powered Suction Assembly
The Problem
Patients discharged home on tracheostomy tubes in resource limited settings face a critical unmet need: AC powered suction devices fail during power outages, routine in rural and semi urban India, leaving tracheostomy blockage with no reliable management option at home. Battery powered alternatives (Laerdal being the recognised gold standard) are priced far beyond the reach of this patient population.
The Solution
Structured needs finding was conducted to formally characterise the patient population, failure point, clinical consequence, and existing solution gap. Development of a low cost, battery powered, pressure controlled portable suction device designed for home care use in resource limited settings is currently ongoing.
Biodesign Stage Progress
| Code | Stage | Status | What Was Done |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.1 | Strategic Focus | ✓ Complete | Focused on home tracheostomy care failure in power unreliable settings |
| 1.2 | Needs Exploration | ✓ Complete | Observed patients returning with trach blocks; AC power dependency identified as root cause |
| 1.3 | Need Statement | ✓ Complete | Formally validated: tracheostomy patients need reliable, affordable, battery powered portable suction |
| 2.2 | Existing Solutions | ✓ Complete | Benchmarked against Laerdal Suction Unit; cost identified as prohibitive barrier |
| 2.4 | Market Analysis | ► Active | Estimating patient population size, complication frequency, and willingness to pay |
| 2.5 | Needs Selection | ► Active | Needs prioritisation and solution criteria definition in progress |
| 3+ | Invent | ○ Pending | Ideation, concept generation, and prototyping to follow needs finalisation |
| 5+ | Implementation | ○ Pending | IP, regulatory, and commercialisation strategy to be developed |
Intraoperative Nerve Protection
A near zero cost 360° nerve shield repurposed from a sterile nasogastric tube protecting the IAN during mandibular osteotomy.
★ Technical Note under review — JOMS · 6 month follow up: intact IAN function
Operative Illustration Panels — Ryles Tube Nerve Sleeve Technique for IAN Protection
The Problem
Inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) injury during mandibular osteotomy causes transient neurosensory deficits in up to 37% of cases. Piezoelectric systems reduce this risk but are unaffordable in resource limited settings. Conventional vessel loops provide protection on one surface only.
The Solution
A sterile Ryles nasogastric tube, universally stocked at near zero cost, slit longitudinally and placed as a 360° circumferential nerve shield sleeve. Formalised into a reproducible protocol with a French size selection table matched to published IAN canal diameters. Applied intraoperatively: fully intact IAN sensory function at 6 month review.
Biodesign Stage Progress
| Code | Stage | Status | What Was Done |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.2 | Needs Exploration | ✓ Complete | IAN injury risk during osteotomy identified as high stakes unmet need in resource limited centres |
| 1.3 | Need Statement | ✓ Complete | Surgeons need a low cost, reliable, 360° nerve protection method during IAN transposition |
| 2.2 | Existing Solutions | ✓ Complete | Benchmarked against vessel loops and piezoelectric systems; key gaps identified |
| 3.1 | Ideation | ✓ Complete | Conceived Ryles tube as circumferential nerve sleeve, repurposing stocked theatre consumable |
| 3.2 | Concept Selection | ✓ Complete | French size selection protocol developed; failure modes identified and mitigated |
| 4.5 | Prototyping | ✓ Complete | Technique applied intraoperatively: 6 month follow up confirms intact IAN function |
| 4.6 | Concept Testing | ✓ Complete | Clinical outcome validated; reproducible protocol with sizing table documented |
| 5.1 | IP Strategy | ► Active | Patent landscape review pending; manuscript under review at JOMS |
| 5+ | Implementation | ○ Pending | Multicentre prospective study, regulatory classification, and adoption strategy to be developed |
Transoral Submandibular Access
A wearable finger sheath combining loop scissor spreading and Metzenbaum dissection for transoral submandibular access without a transcervical incision.
◎ Concept and mechanism design ongoing · IP landscape search to be initiated
The Problem
Submandibular gland and duct surgery conventionally requires an extraoral transcervical incision, resulting in a visible neck scar with risk to the marginal mandibular branch of the facial nerve. Transoral access via the floor of mouth is limited by confined working space where standard scissors cannot be effectively oriented.
The Solution
A finger mounted dissector combining loop scissor spreading action with Metzenbaum scissor tissue separation, worn as a finger sheath, integrating tactile duct palpation with active blunt dissection in a single motion within a space too confined for two handed instrumentation. Eliminates the transcervical incision and its associated morbidity entirely.
Biodesign Stage Progress
| Code | Stage | Status | What Was Done |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.2 | Needs Exploration | ✓ Complete | Access limitation identified as driver of extraoral approach |
| 1.3 | Need Statement | ✓ Complete | Surgeons need compact intraoral instrument for transoral submandibular gland access |
| 2.2 | Existing Solutions | ✓ Complete | Benchmarked against sialendoscopy and handheld scissors; confined space access gap identified |
| 3.1 | Ideation | ✓ Complete | Conceived finger mounted dissector combining loop scissor and Metzenbaum mechanics |
| 3.2 | Concept Selection | ► Active | Mechanism design and ergonomic refinement ongoing; instrument profile being defined |
| 4.1 | IP Basics | ► Active | IP landscape search to be conducted; provisional filing to be initiated |
| 4.5 | Prototyping | ○ Pending | Physical prototype, bench testing, and cadaveric feasibility study to follow |
| 5+ | Implementation | ○ Pending | Regulatory pathway, clinical validation, and commercialisation strategy to be developed |
About
Oral and maxillofacial surgeon with a record of translating clinical challenges into original device innovations, computational implant design, and high quality evidence synthesis. Combines surgical expertise with computational tools including FEA, implicit modelling, and additive manufacturing.
National Rankings
Career
Consultant Head and Neck Surgical Oncologist
Homi Bhabha Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Muzaffarpur
Tata Memorial Centre Affiliate · Head and Neck Disease Management Group
Resident Surgeon — MDS, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
PGIMS Rohtak, Pt. B.D. Sharma University of Health Sciences
Rotatory Posting, Dept. of Surgical Oncology · 500+ procedures
Best Research Paper, AOMSI Haryana State Chapter 2025
MDS — Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
PGIMS, Pt. B.D. Sharma University of Health Sciences, Rohtak
Bachelor of Dental Surgery (BDS)
Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences
Awards and Recognition
Bibliography
For Innovators
I collaborate with engineers, designers, clinicians, and founders working on surgical instrumentation, implants, and frugal medical technology. If you are building at the intersection of surgery and engineering, I would like to hear about it.
drjishnumaxcfac@gmail.comRecent Experience
Consultant Head and Neck Surgical Oncologist
Homi Bhabha Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Muzaffarpur
Tata Memorial Centre Affiliate · Jan 2025 to Jun 2026
Resident Surgeon — MDS, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
PGIMS Rohtak, Pt. B.D. Sharma University of Health Sciences · 2022 to 2025